<img height="1" width="1" style="display:none" src="https://www.facebook.com/tr?id=183154879077085&amp;ev=PageView&amp;noscript=1">

Voluntary Retirement Contributions in Chapter 13 Bankruptcy

Retirement-funds

For individuals considering Chapter 13 bankruptcy, one of the most important requirements of the process is committing disposable income toward repayment of creditors. While Chapter 13 offers powerful protections such as stopping foreclosure, reorganizing debt, and creating a structured repayment plan, it also requires debtors to make reasonable financial adjustments during the repayment period.

One question that frequently arises is whether a debtor may continue making voluntary retirement contributions or repaying loans taken from retirement accounts while participating in a Chapter 13 plan.

The United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit addressed this issue directly in Anes v. DeHart (In re Anes), 195 F.3d 177 (3d Cir. 1999). The court held that voluntary retirement contributions and certain retirement loan repayments generally must be treated as disposable income when unsecured creditors are not being paid in full.

For individuals filing bankruptcy in New Jersey, Pennsylvania, or Delaware, all within the Third Circuit In re Anes remains a key decision guiding how courts evaluate Chapter 13 repayment plans.

 

Disposable Income Requirement in Chapter 13

Chapter 13 bankruptcy allows individuals with regular income to reorganize their debts through a court-approved repayment plan lasting three to five years. However, the Bankruptcy Code requires debtors to dedicate their available financial resources to repaying creditors during this period.

Under 11 U.S.C. § 1325(b), when a trustee or unsecured creditor objects to confirmation of a Chapter 13 plan, the court may confirm the plan only if:

  1. The plan provides for full payment of unsecured creditors, or
  2. The debtor commits all projected disposable income to the repayment plan for the applicable commitment period.

For individuals not engaged in business, disposable income generally means income that is not reasonably necessary for the maintenance or support of the debtor or the debtor’s dependents.

This statutory framework ensures that Chapter 13 operates as a genuine repayment process rather than a mechanism for protecting income that could otherwise be distributed to creditors.

 

The Third Circuit’s Decision in In re Anes

The issue in In re Anes arose when debtors filed Chapter 13 plans that proposed to continue payroll deductions used to repay loans taken from their retirement accounts. At the same time, the proposed plans offered little or no repayment to unsecured creditors.

The Chapter 13 trustee objected to confirmation of the plans. Both the bankruptcy court and the district court rejected them, and the Third Circuit ultimately affirmed those decisions.

The court concluded that the retirement loan repayments were not reasonably necessary for the debtors’ present maintenance or support. If the debtors stopped making the payments, the outstanding balance would simply be deducted from their retirement accounts rather than creating an immediate financial hardship.

As a result, continuing those payments effectively served to protect or increase retirement savings rather than address present financial needs.

The Third Circuit therefore held that these payments must be treated as disposable income that should be directed to creditors when unsecured claims are not being paid in full.

The court articulated an important principle that continues to guide bankruptcy courts today:

Investments may be financially prudent, but they are not necessary expenses for the support of the debtor or the debtor’s dependents. Investments are therefore made with disposable income; disposable income is not what remains after those investments are made.



What “Belt Tightening” Means in Chapter 13 Bankruptcy

Courts frequently describe Chapter 13 as requiring a period of “belt tightening.” This concept does not mean that debtors must live in poverty or eliminate every discretionary expense.

However, the Bankruptcy Code expects debtors to adjust their financial priorities temporarily so that creditors receive the payments the law requires.

In practice, this means that only expenses necessary for present maintenance and support are protected when calculating disposable income. Expenses primarily designed to build future wealth, such as voluntary retirement contributions, generally must yield to creditor repayment during the life of the plan.

 

Expenses Courts Typically Consider Reasonably Necessary

When evaluating a Chapter 13 plan, courts generally recognize certain categories of expenses as necessary for a debtor’s maintenance and support. These may include:

  • Housing costs such as rent or mortgage payments
  • Utilities and essential household expenses
  • Food and basic living necessities
  • Transportation required for employment
  • Health insurance and medical care
  • Reasonable support for dependents

 

These expenses are directly tied to a debtor’s ability to maintain a basic standard of living during the repayment period.

 

Expenses That May Be Treated as Disposable Income

By contrast, courts often view certain expenditures as non-essential when unsecured creditors are not receiving full repayment.

These may include:

  • Voluntary retirement contributions
  • Repayment of loans taken from retirement accounts
  • Investment or savings contributions
  • Other discretionary financial planning expenses

 

Although these decisions may be financially responsible in the long term, In re Anes makes clear that Chapter 13 focuses on present financial necessity rather than long-term financial investments.

In other words, the Bankruptcy Code distinguishes between living expenses and wealth-building investments, protecting only the former when calculating disposable income.

 

Additional Bankruptcy Code Provisions That Affect Disposable Income

Several other provisions of the Bankruptcy Code work alongside §1325 to determine whether a Chapter 13 plan may be confirmed.

For example:

  • 11 U.S.C. § 1322 governs the contents of a Chapter 13 plan and how claims may be classified and paid.
  • 11 U.S.C. § 707(b)(2) provides the means-test framework that influences disposable income calculations for many debtors.
  • 11 U.S.C. § 1325(a) establishes the general confirmation requirements for Chapter 13 plans, including the requirement that the plan be proposed in good faith.

 

Together, these provisions ensure that Chapter 13 balances the interests of both debtors and creditors.

More information about Chapter 13 bankruptcy is available through the United States Courts website.

Why In re Anes Still Matters Today

For debtors and attorneys practicing in the Third Circuit, In re Anes remains an influential precedent in Chapter 13 plan confirmation.

The case reinforces several important principles:

  • Chapter 13 requires debtors to commit disposable income to creditor repayment.
  • Voluntary retirement contributions are generally treated as disposable income when unsecured creditors are not paid in full.
  • Debtors must demonstrate a period of financial discipline while completing their repayment plan.

 

These rules ensure that Chapter 13 strikes a fair balance between providing debtors an opportunity to reorganize their finances and protecting the rights of creditors.


Chapter 13 Requires Financial Prioritization

The Third Circuit’s decision in In re Anes highlights a central principle of Chapter 13 bankruptcy: debtors must prioritize creditor repayment over elective financial investments during the repayment period.

While the Bankruptcy Code protects reasonable living expenses, it generally does not permit debtors to continue voluntary retirement savings when unsecured creditors are not being paid in full.

For many individuals, Chapter 13 represents a temporary period of financial discipline that ultimately leads to a fresh financial start.

 

Speak With an Experienced New Jersey Bankruptcy Attorney

If you are considering Chapter 13 bankruptcy and have questions about how retirement contributions or other financial obligations may affect your repayment plan, it is important to seek experienced legal guidance.

At Scura, Wigfield, Heyer, Stevens & Cammarota, LLP, our attorneys regularly help individuals throughout New Jersey evaluate their financial options and develop strategic solutions for debt relief. We understand that every financial situation is unique, and we work closely with our clients to create practical, legally sound strategies for moving forward.

If you are struggling with overwhelming debt or considering bankruptcy, we encourage you to contact our office to schedule a consultation and learn how Chapter 13 may help you regain control of your financial future.

author-profile-image

David L. Stevens

David Stevens, Esq. is a partner at Scura, Wigfield, Heyer, Stevens & Cammarota, LLP, one of the largest consumer bankruptcy law firms in New Jersey. Mr. Stevens is a Gulf War veteran and previously worked in the mortgage lending industry before pursuing a career in law. His experience gives him a unique perspective on the financial and legal issues surrounding consumer bankruptcy and foreclosure defense. He focuses his practice on helping individuals and families navigate complex financial challenges through Chapter 7 and Chapter 13 bankruptcy, foreclosure defense, and debt restructuring.

Need Help? Contact Us Today!